You’ve probably heard it before: “I’m buying cheap properties because it’s a safe strategy backed by data.” But here’s the thing: data can help you manage risk, but it doesn’t eliminate it. And buying cheap properties, whether in small regional towns or the least expensive areas within a regional hub, often comes with its own set of challenges that many investors overlook.
Today, I want to share why investing in cheap properties isn’t the magic bullet for building wealth and why focusing on the total value and growth potential of your portfolio is a far more effective strategy.
The Trap of Cheap Properties in Small Regional Towns
Many investors are drawn to small regional towns because of their affordability. It’s tempting to look at low property prices and think, “I can buy more properties here, diversify, and reduce my risk.” But let’s take a closer look.
- Limited demand: Small towns often have limited population growth, fewer job opportunities, and less infrastructure development. This means that while you may be able to purchase properties at a lower price, the demand for those properties is much lower, both in terms of renters and buyers.
- Slow or stagnant growth: Without significant economic drivers, property prices in these areas tend to stagnate or grow very slowly. So while your initial investment may seem low, the long-term growth potential is often limited, leaving you with properties that aren’t appreciating in value.
- Risky diversification: Many investors buy in these areas under the guise of “diversification,” thinking that spreading their portfolio across different regions protects them from risk. But the truth is, **diversification doesn’t reduce risk if the areas you’re investing in aren’t growing**. Just because you own multiple properties doesn’t mean you’re protected—if they’re in low-growth or stagnant areas, you could actually be exposing yourself to more risk.
The Difference Between Cheap and Strategic Buying in Regional Hubs
Even within the same regional hubs, there’s a big difference between choosing the cheapest property in a lower-end suburb and investing in a more affluent area of the same region. While affordability can be enticing, focusing only on the cheapest option can limit your potential for growth and expose you to higher risks.
Here’s why:
- Regional growth isn’t uniform: Not all suburbs within a regional hub perform equally. The cheaper areas may lack the infrastructure, amenities, or appeal that drive long-term property value growth in more affluent, established suburbs. You might get into the market at a lower price point, but the real question is whether that property will appreciate over time.
- Higher growth potential in affluent areas: Properties in more affluent, in-demand suburbs tend to have stronger long-term growth potential. These areas attract higher-income residents, more investment in local infrastructure, and better overall demand. While the upfront cost might be higher, the long-term return on investment can far outweigh the short-term savings of going cheap.
- Better quality tenants: More affluent areas often attract tenants who are more stable and less likely to cause issues like high turnover or late payments. Investing in these areas reduces the risk of constant tenant turnover and the headaches that come with it.
Rather than focusing solely on buying cheap, strategically selecting properties in more desirable suburbs within a regional hub can lead to much stronger long-term growth and a more manageable portfolio overall.
Data Doesn’t Stop Risk; It Manages It
One of the most common arguments for buying cheap properties is that investors are using data to make their decisions. And while data is incredibly valuable for managing risk, it’s important to remember that it doesn’t eliminate risk. Just because the data tells you a property is cheap now doesn’t mean it will grow later. In fact, relying solely on data without considering the broader picture can lead you into high-risk situations where growth is unlikely.
Here’s the key: Data should guide your decisions, not justify buying cheap for the sake of it.
Look beyond affordability: Data can show you where property prices are low, but you need to dig deeper into whether those areas have the potential for growth. Are jobs being created? Is infrastructure being developed? Are people moving into the area? Simply buying the cheapest property won’t generate wealth if the underlying fundamentals for growth aren’t there. To better understand what truly drives growth, take a look at what really influences long-term property value.
Here’s the key: Data should guide your decisions, not justify buying cheap for the sake of it.
- Look beyond affordability: Data can show you where property prices are low, but you need to dig deeper into whether those areas have the potential for growth. Are jobs being created? Is infrastructure being developed? Are people moving into the area? Simply buying the cheapest property won’t generate wealth if the underlying fundamentals for growth aren’t there.
- Data can be deceiving: Sometimes, the data you’re looking at might show a short-term uptick in growth or rental yield, but without long-term fundamentals, that performance can be short-lived. Buying cheap because the data suggests “good value” today might leave you stuck with a property that doesn’t perform in the future.
More Properties Don’t Equal More Wealth
There’s a common misconception among investors that the more properties you own, the wealthier you’ll be. But wealth creation in property investment is about the total value of your portfolio, not the number of properties you hold.
Let me paint a picture:
Would you rather own five cheap properties in a small regional town, each worth $200,000, or two properties in a growth area of a regional hub, each worth $700,000?
Sure, five properties might sound more impressive, but when you look at the numbers:
- – The regional properties might grow slowly or not at all, leaving you with little equity to leverage for future investments.
- – The two higher-value properties in a more affluent suburb of a regional hub, in contrast, have the potential to grow in value significantly over time, providing you with the equity to expand your portfolio more effectively.
In the end, it’s the total gross value of your portfolio that drives wealth, not the number of properties. Focusing on quality—properties with strong growth potential, located in areas with demand and future prospects—will build your portfolio’s value faster than simply accumulating more cheap properties.
The True Cost of Cheap Properties
Let’s not forget the hidden costs that come with owning cheap properties:
- Maintenance and repairs: Cheaper properties are often older and require more upkeep. These ongoing expenses can eat into your returns.
- Tenant turnover: Lower-priced properties often attract tenants who are more likely to move frequently, meaning higher turnover rates, more vacancy periods, and the constant hassle of finding new tenants.
- Slower capital growth: While cheap properties might offer a higher rental yield initially, their long-term capital growth potential is often limited, which is where real wealth is built.
The Bottom Line: Quality Over Quantity
The next time you’re considering an investment, remember: it’s not about how many properties you can buy, but about the growth potential and value of the properties you choose.
Buying cheap properties in small towns or lower-end suburbs of regional hubs might seem like a good idea in the short term, but if those properties don’t have the potential for growth, they’ll ultimately slow down your wealth-building efforts.
By focusing on fewer, higher-quality properties in areas with strong growth fundamentals, you’ll not only build a portfolio that’s easier to manage, but one that’s poised for long-term success.
